Talk:John O'Hart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Ireland (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.


This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/John O'Hart. The consensus was to keep it. dbenbenn | talk 23:44, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:John-ohart-wsig.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:John-ohart-wsig.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Link to Agnon[edit]

I am no expert in this area, but the link to Agnon looks wrong to me. I haven't made any change, but have commented here so that someone more knowledgable can consider it. Pyobon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC).

Article Content Needs to be Rewritten[edit]

While it is apparent why someone nominated this article for deletion about 5 years ago, it appears to certainly be valid for inclusion. However, this article is not constructed to indicate the nebulous nature of this man's (also apparent) ridiculous research or what was called research at the time. This article requires an entire rewrite to indicate the factual basis of this otherwise irresponsible scholasticism... Propaganda is not legend nor is it history. Stevenmitchell (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)